Kendrakirai wrote:
I still want to know the why.
So do I.
I want to know why everyone* thinks Ennesby is always right when he's been wrong in the past.
As he is once again here.
1 - If the All-Star wanted to kick off all-consuming galatic war, there are simpler ways to accomplish this.
For example just send a delegation to Ein-Afa and hack the Ot-Skadak there. Or hack Chinook.
Or just use their own long-guns.
You know,
simpler things.2 - For 'this' to have been their plan to had to know an awful lot about the state of the galaxy and then they had to know an awful lot about how individuals would react.
They had to have information about the Cynthetic Certianty's crew that even Keff Tagon
didn't have. Let that [EXPLICATIVE] sink in for minute.
They had to know more about the crew of Kaff's, more about a crew that the captain of routinely goes out of his way to learn about. Kaff goes to lengths to find out things (this isn't shown, but the end results have been. Mostly so he can cheat to win with them).
Kaff knows his crew. These Ot-Skadok combat drones had capabilities that
he did not know of.
Therefore, in this case the simplest position is: Ennesby is wrong. So wrong he wraps around and starts being right again...
My theory is that the A.S.S. (All-Star Saboteurs) are improvising at this point. They likely believe there are assets on Cindy that contain the location of the All-Star. So the A.S.S. are aiming to gain Cindy to remove it from the board. Thus when hackable assets hit the field, they hacked them. No 'long-gun war', no'galactic' kick-off. Just remove Cindy from the equation (and thus make it easier to remove the six remaining combatants from the loading bay).
And they were still acting with
restraint. Why is this being overlooked? They may be A.S.S.es, but they are still acting to minimize casualties.
Yes, I am proud of myself for that last sentence.